Are you the publisher? Claim or contact us about this channel

 Report adult content:

 click to rate:

Account: (login)

## Articles on this Page

(showing articles 1 to 11 of 11)
(showing articles 1 to 11 of 11)

 Browse the Latest Snapshot Browsing All Articles (11 Articles) Live Browser

## Channel Description:

The most recent questions and posts on MaplePrimes tagged with perturbation
 0 0
• 05/25/14--03:40: how to solve by vim or DTM?
• hi dears. i cant solve this question by Analytical method such variational itteration method (VIM) or homotopy perturbation method (HPM), homotopy analysis method(HAM)

1)  diff(f(eta),eta$3)+(1)/(2)*f(eta)*diff(f(eta),eta$2- K* (diff(f(eta),eta)-1)=0

boundary conditions: 1)  f(0) = 0   2)  D(f)(0) = 0   3)  D(f)(infinity=10) = 1

K=0.2

 0 0

Hello everyone,

I've been trying to do some perturbation theory and ran into some problems I don't quite understand. I implemented the Hamiltonian of the Bose-Hubbard model and treated the hopping as a perturbation. Calculating the second order energy shift is easily accomplished, but when I'm only interested in one of the two occuring terms, I run into problems. The calculation takes minutes to finally fail, giving me an "too many levels of recursion"-error. I need to be able to just pick a few terms for some calculations, I'm doing, and can't figure out what I might be doing wrong. Here is the source code (download is below):

 >
 >
 >
 (1)
 >
 >
 (2)
 >
 Error, (in PatternMatching:-AlgStruct:-Match) too many levels of recursion
 >

Download too_many_levels_of_recursion.mw

It would be great, if someone could point out the mistake, I'm making. I copy/pasted the last line, so there shouldn't be any typos.

Thanks in advance,

Sören

 0 0

Hi!

I seem to run into problems with (quantum) perturbation theory. In the following minimal working example, an energy denominator, as occuring in perturbation theory is not evaluated if I previously assume that the quantum number is a positive integer. It's supposed to return an error, as the energy denominator is 0.

 >
 >
 >
 (1)
 >
 >
 (2)
 >
 >
 (3)
 >
 (4)
 >

Download energy_denominator.mw

Best regards,

Sören

 0 0

HPM_4.mwhi, I am using homotopy perturbation technique but there is arising an error in comaring coeffecient of p^0, p^1,.... plz help me

 0 0
• 05/28/16--02:31: Problem with HPM
• Hi everyone.

I'm going to solve a problem with HPM in Maple. I wrote some initial codes but now I'm confused becouse of P^0 coefficients in A1 and B1. I mean I can't reach to f0 and g0.

I upload that file. these are codes that i typed. could you please help me how can I reach to them(f0 & g0)?

http://www.filehosting.org/file/details/573095/Maple%20Project+.mw

 0 0
• 06/16/16--19:59: Metric Perturbation
• Hi All,

I'm using the Physics package, which enables GR calculations, ie defining metrics and tensor algebra.

Was just curious if it were possible to add a perturbation to the metric when calculating Ricci and Christoffels.

I would like something like

g_[] = g1_[mu,nu] + h[mu,nu]

And then do a calculation like,

Ricci[].

I know this would be possible if I define everything and re-write the calculations for calculating Ricci, i.e

Define(g1[mu,nu], h[mu,nu]);

and the proceed with GR calculations to find Ricci, however was hoping there was an easier way to do this.

Any help is appreciated.

Thanks guys.

 0 0

Please help me to solve the system of 1st order singular O.D.E  (see uploaded file)....New_Microsoft_Office_Word_Document.docx

 0 0
• 05/25/14--03:40: how to solve by vim or DTM?
• hi dears. i cant solve this question by Analytical method such variational itteration method (VIM) or homotopy perturbation method (HPM), homotopy analysis method(HAM)

1)  diff(f(eta),eta$3)+(1)/(2)*f(eta)*diff(f(eta),eta$2- K* (diff(f(eta),eta)-1)=0

boundary conditions: 1)  f(0) = 0   2)  D(f)(0) = 0   3)  D(f)(infinity=10) = 1

K=0.2

 0 0
• 03/23/18--13:41: perturbation theorie
• Hi all, I am having the follwing DE:

restart:
(diff(z(x), x, x))-z(x) - cos(2*x)/(1+delta*z(x)) = 0:

With initial conditions: z(-pi/4)=z(pi/4)=0 and |delta|<<1

I showed by hand by using perturbation theory the second order approximation. The hint was: you can use Maple to check your answer.

Is there somebody who can help me with this?

 0 0

I am working with the following differential equation:

$\frac{d^2z}{dx^2}+z=\frac{\cos 2x}{1+\epsilon z},\:\:\:z(-\pi/4)=z(\pi/4)=0$

where modulus of $\epsilon$ is much less than $1$.  The task is then to use perturbation theory (with Maple, if necessary) to show that the second-order approximation to the solution to this DE is:

$z=-\frac{1}{3}\cos 2x +\epsilon\bigg(\frac{1}{6}-\frac{8\sqrt{2}}{45}\cos x - \frac{1}{90}\cos 4x \bigg) + \epsilon^2 \bigg(\frac{2\sqrt{2}x}{45}\sin x - \frac{\sqrt{2}}{90}(\pi + 1)\cos x + \frac{7}{720} \cos 2x - \frac{\sqrt{2}}{90}\cos 3x - \frac{1}{1050}\cos 6x \bigg).$

I will then likely have to use Maple to determine the third-order term $\delta^{3}z_{3}(x)$ and evaluate $z_{3}(x)$ at $x=0$ and $x-\pi/8$.

My starting point is to use the theory for a regular perturbation (since the modulus of $\epsilon$ is much less than $1$).  For the unperturbed equation, I could set $\epsilon=0$ as that would give a simple differential equation which should be solvable.  I can then see that $1/{1+\epsilon z}$ can be expanded to second-order in $\epsilon$ as $1 - \epsilon z + \epsilon^2 z^2 + O(\epsilon^3), which looks promising. Could someone advise how I put this together? Do I then have to multiply the unperturbed solution by the expansion in$\epsilon\$?

 0 0

Dear sir / madam

Hi
I'm a student of mechanical engineering and looking for some HPM ( homotopy perturbation method) maple codes with the related article to practice more in this field.
can I ask you for help?
unfortunately, I couldn't find any articles with maple solution about HPM.

sincerely
Aidin